The data set on battle deaths developed by Nils Petter and Bethany (Lacina) has been the centre of attention in a heated debate. Now, the two have received heavy weight support in a newly published article in the Journal of Conflict Resolution by Michael Spagat, Andrew Mack, Tara Cooper and Joakim Kreutz. The critics of the PRIO data claims that they underestimate battle deaths by as much as two thirds, but, claims Spagat and associates, ‘their comparison fails to compare like with like’. Likewise, the onslaught on our colleagues’ claim that deaths in war is on a steady decline gets short shrift in the article. Read for yourself. This is strong professional and moral support for Nils Petter and Bethany, and ultimately for PRIO’s data work.Monday, 21 December 2009
Support for PRIO researchers’ data
The data set on battle deaths developed by Nils Petter and Bethany (Lacina) has been the centre of attention in a heated debate. Now, the two have received heavy weight support in a newly published article in the Journal of Conflict Resolution by Michael Spagat, Andrew Mack, Tara Cooper and Joakim Kreutz. The critics of the PRIO data claims that they underestimate battle deaths by as much as two thirds, but, claims Spagat and associates, ‘their comparison fails to compare like with like’. Likewise, the onslaught on our colleagues’ claim that deaths in war is on a steady decline gets short shrift in the article. Read for yourself. This is strong professional and moral support for Nils Petter and Bethany, and ultimately for PRIO’s data work.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment